FEBS Letters
Volume 579, Issue 8 , Pages 1846-1853, 21 March 2005

The dynamic systems approach to control and regulation of intracellular networks

Edited by Robert Russell and Giulio Superti-Furga

  • Olaf Wolkenhauer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Computer Science, Systems Biology and Bioinformatics Group, University of Rostock, Albert Einstein Str. 21, 18059 Rostock, Germany
    • Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel./fax: +49 381 498 75 70/75
    web address
  • ,
  • Mukhtar Ullah

      Affiliations

    • Department of Computer Science, Systems Biology and Bioinformatics Group, University of Rostock, Albert Einstein Str. 21, 18059 Rostock, Germany
  • ,
  • Peter Wellstead

      Affiliations

    • Hamilton Institute, National University of Ireland, NUI Maynooth, Co., Kildare, Ireland
  • ,
  • Kwang-Hyun Cho

      Affiliations

    • College of Medicine and Korea Bio-MAX Institute, Seoul National University, Chongno-gu, Seoul 110 799, Republic of Korea

Accepted 1 February 2005. published online 11 February 2005.

Abstract 

Systems theory and cell biology have enjoyed a long relationship that has received renewed interest in recent years in the context of systems biology. The term ‘systems’ in systems biology comes from systems theory or dynamic systems theory: systems biology is defined through the application of systems- and signal-oriented approaches for an understanding of inter- and intra-cellular dynamic processes. The aim of the present text is to review the systems and control perspective of dynamic systems. The biologist’s conceptual framework for representing the variables of a biochemical reaction network, and for describing their relationships, are pathway maps. A principal goal of systems biology is to turn these static maps into dynamic models, which can provide insight into the temporal evolution of biochemical reaction networks. Towards this end, we review the case for differential equation models as a ‘natural’ representation of causal entailment in pathways. Block-diagrams, commonly used in the engineering sciences, are introduced and compared to pathway maps. The stimulus–response representation of a molecular system is a necessary condition for an understanding of dynamic interactions among the components that make up a pathway. Using simple examples, we show how biochemical reactions are modelled in the dynamic systems framework and visualized using block-diagrams.

Abbreviations: ODEs, ordinary differential equations, PDEs, partial differential equations

Keywords: Pathway, Biochemical reaction network, Dynamics, Feedback, Block-diagram

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0014-5793(05)00174-2

doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2005.02.008

FEBS Letters
Volume 579, Issue 8 , Pages 1846-1853, 21 March 2005