FEBS Letters
Volume 581, Issue 3 , Pages 506-514, 6 February 2007

QSARs and activity predicting models for competitive inhibitors of adenosine deaminase

Edited by Robert B. Russell

  • Sayyed Hamed Sadat Hayatshahi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Science, Tarbiat Modares University, P.O. Box 14115/175, Tehran, Iran
  • ,
  • Parviz Abdolmaleki

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Science, Tarbiat Modares University, P.O. Box 14115/175, Tehran, Iran
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Mina Ghiasi

      Affiliations

    • School of Chemistry, Sharif University, P.O. Box 11365-9516, Tehran, Iran
  • ,
  • Shahrokh Safarian

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Tehran University, P.O. Box 13155-6455, Tehran, Iran

Received 30 August 2006; received in revised form 16 December 2006; accepted 25 December 2006. published online 12 January 2007.

Abstract 

Combinations of multiple linear regressions, genetic algorithms and artificial neural networks were utilized to develop models for seeking quantitative structure–activity relationships that correlate structural descriptors and inhibition activity of adenosine deaminase competitive inhibitors. Many quantitative descriptors were generated to express the physicochemical properties of 70 compounds with optimized structures in aqueous solution. Multiple linear regressions were used to linearly select different subsets of descriptors and develop linear models for prediction of log(ki). The best subset then fed artificial neural networks to develop nonlinear predictors. A committee of six hybrid models – that included genetic algorithm routines together with neural networks – was also utilized to nonlinearly select most efficient subsets of descriptors in a cross-validation procedure for nonlinear log(ki) prediction. The best prediction model was found to be an 8-3-1 artificial neural network which was fed by the most frequently selected descriptors among these subsets. This prediction model resulted in train set root mean sum square error (RMSE) of 0.84 log(ki) and prediction set RMSE of 0.85 log(ki) (both equivalent of 0.10 in normal range of log(ki)) and correlation coefficient (r2) of 0.91.

Abbreviations: QSAR, quantitative structure–activity relationship, RMSE, root mean sum square error, ADA, adenosine deaminase

Keywords: Quantitative structure–activity relationship, Adenosine deaminase, Inhibitors, Neural networks, Genetic algorithms, Multiple linear regressions

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0014-5793(07)00019-1

doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2006.12.050

FEBS Letters
Volume 581, Issue 3 , Pages 506-514, 6 February 2007