FEBS Letters
Volume 581, Issue 24 , Pages 4767-4772, 2 October 2007

Suppressor of T-cell receptor signalling 1 and 2 differentially regulate endocytosis and signalling of receptor tyrosine kinases

Edited by Veli-Pekka Lehto

  • Josipa Raguz

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Biochemistry II, Goethe University Medical School, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    • Tumor Biology Program, Mediterranean Institute for Life Sciences, Split, Croatia
  • ,
  • Sebastian Wagner

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Biochemistry II, Goethe University Medical School, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • ,
  • Ivan Dikic

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Biochemistry II, Goethe University Medical School, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    • Tumor Biology Program, Mediterranean Institute for Life Sciences, Split, Croatia
  • ,
  • Daniela Hoeller

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Biochemistry II, Goethe University Medical School, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    • Biocenter Innsbruck, Fritz-Pregl-Strasse 3, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Biocenter Innsbruck, Fritz-Pregl-Strasse 3, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria. Fax: +43 664 12 88 796.

Received 23 August 2007; accepted 28 August 2007. published online 10 September 2007.

Abstract 

Suppressor of T-cell receptor signalling 1 and 2 (Sts-1 and 2) negatively regulate the endocytosis of receptor tyrosine kinases. The UBA domain of Sts-2 and SH3-dependent Cbl-binding are required for this function. Sts-1 and -2 also possess a PGM domain, which was recently reported to exhibit tyrosine phosphatase activity. Here, we demonstrate that the PGM of Sts-1, but not of Sts-2, dephosphorylates the EGFR at multiple tyrosines thereby terminating its signalling and endocytosis. In contrast to Sts-2 the UBA of Sts-1 did not contribute significantly to receptor stabilization. Thus, although Sts-1 and Sts-2 are structurally highly homologous and both inhibit ligand-induced EGFR degradation, their mechanisms of action differ significantly. As a consequence, Sts-1-containing receptor complexes are inactive, whereas Sts-2-containing complexes are signalling competent.

Keywords: Sts-1, Sts-2, Phosphatase, UBA, PGM endocytosis, Receptor, Tyrosine phosphorylation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0014-5793(07)00964-7

doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2007.08.077

FEBS Letters
Volume 581, Issue 24 , Pages 4767-4772, 2 October 2007