FEBS Letters
Volume 582, Issue 9 , Pages 1298-1306, 16 April 2008

Co-activation of GABA receptors inhibits the JNK3 apoptotic pathway via the disassembly of the GluR6-PSD95-MLK3 signaling module in cerebral ischemic-reperfusion

Edited by Jesus Avila

Research Center for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Disease Bioinformation, Xuzhou Medical College, 84 West Huai-hai Road, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221002, PR China

Received 6 December 2007; received in revised form 19 January 2008; accepted 18 February 2008. published online 26 February 2008.

Article Outline

Abstract 

In this study, we investigated whether the increase of inhibitory γ-amino butyric acid (GABA) signal suppresses the excitatory glutamate signal induced by cerebral ischemia and the underlying mechanisms. In global cerebral ischemia, focal cerebral ischemia and oxygen-glucose deprivation, application of muscimol and baclofen, agonists of GABA(A) receptor and GABA(B) receptor, exerted neuroprotection. The agonists inhibited the increased assembly of the GluR6-PSD-95-MLK3 module induced by cerebral ischemia and the activation of the MLK3-MKK4/7-JNK3 cascade. Our results suggest that stimulation of the inhibitory GABA receptors can attenuate the excitatory JNK3 apoptotic signaling pathway via inhibiting the increased assembly of the GluR6-PSD-95-MLK3 signaling module in cerebral ischemia.

Abbreviations: NMDA, N-methyl-d-aspartic acid, GABA, γ-amino butyric acid

Keywords: Cerebral ischemia, Muscimol, Baclofen, JNK pathway, Neuroprotection

 

Back to Article Outline

1. Introduction 

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system. Thus GABA release in cerebral ischemia is also likely to be important, because it can alter concentration of extracellular glutamate [1]. GABA activates three types of specific receptors: GABA(A), GABA(B) and GABA(C) receptors. At present, little is known about GABA(C) receptor-mediated events. GABA(B) receptors are metabotropic and seven transmembrane receptors that are G-proteins-coupled and mediate the GABA signaling via several second messenger pathways and Ca2+ and K+ ion channels, whilst stimulation of ionotropic GABA(A) receptors results in opening the chloride channel [2]. Previous studies suggest that the pharmacologically increased level of GABA activity is correlated with lessened degree of brain ischemic injury [3], [4], [5]. Other investigators, however, have not been able to demonstrate the benefit about those activating GABA receptors in ischemia, particularly those agents relatively specific for the GABA-B receptor [6]. Therefore, the possible neuroprotective mechanism of GABA receptors activation in cerebral ischemia remains to be elucidated.

Our recent studies show that GluR6 (subunit of KA receptor) are activated upon cerebral ischemia, and the assembling of GluR6-PSD-95-MLK3 module, MLK3 autophosphorylation and the downstream phosphorylation of MKK4/7, JNK3, c-Jun and Bcl-2 increased markedly in ischemia/reperfusion. Also, the expression of Fas-Ligand, the release of Bax from Bcl-2/Bax dimmers and the release of cytochrome c from mitochondria markedly increased. Consequently, the activation of Caspase 3 lead to delayed neuronal death in the hippocampal CA1 subfield [7], [8], [9]. Thus, the present study was aimed to identify whether stimulation of the inhibitory GABA receptors have neuroprotective effects thorough inhibiting the excitatory JNK3 apoptotic pathway via disassembly of GluR6-PSD95-MLK3 signaling module in cerebral ischemic-reperfusion, so as to find better therapeutic approach to cerebral ischemia.

Back to Article Outline

2. Materials and methods 

2.1. Animal model of ischemia 

Adult male SD rats (Shanghai Experimental Animal Center, Chinese Academy of Science) weighing 250–300g were used. Four-vessel occlusion (4-VO) cerebral ischemia was induced as described before [1]. Briefly, under anaesthesia with chloral hydrate (350mg/kg, i.p.), vertebral arteries were electrocauterized and common carotid arteries were exposed. Rats were allowed to recover for 24h and fasted overnight. Ischemia was induced by occluding the common arteries with aneurysm clips. Rats which lost their righting reflex within 30s and whose pupils were dilated and unresponsive to light during ischemia were selected for the experiments. An EEG was monitored to ensure isoelectricity within 30s after carotid artery occlusion. Carotid artery blood flow was restored by releasing the clips. Rectal temperature was controlled at 36.5–37.5 °C before and after ischemia–reperfusion and after treatment with drugs via a temperature-regulated heating pad. Sham control animals received the same surgical procedures except that carotid arteries were not occluded.

Focal cerebral ischemia was induced by the intraluminal suture MCAo method as described in Longa et al. [2]. Briefly, the left common carotid artery (CCA), internal carotid artery (ICA), and external carotid artery (ECA) were exposed through a midline incision of the neck. A 3-0 silica gel-coated nylon suture was used as an occluder and was inserted via the ECA. The occluder was inserted through a stump of the ECA and the CCA was kept intact. The occluder was advanced into the ICA about 20mm beyond the carotid bifurcation. Mild resistance indicated that the occluder was properly lodged in the anterior cerebral artery and thus blocked blood flow to the middle cerebral artery. At 1h after MCAO, reperfusion began with the suture withdrawn. In sham-operated animals, the suture was inserted 5mm from the incision.

2.2. Oxygen–glucose deprivation, evaluation of apoptosis and cell viability 

For oxygen–glucose deprivation (OGD), glucose-free Earl’s balanced salt solution (EBSS) medium supplemented with gentamycin (5mg/l) was purged with N2/CO2 (95%/5%) for 20min, resulting in an oxygen content of 1%. Neurons were then washed three times with this medium and incubated for 1h in an oxygen-free N2/CO2 (95%/5%) atmosphere. Control cultures were incubated in EBSS with 10mM glucose. Thereafter, the medium was replaced by standard culture medium. For 24h after onset of OGD, cultured neurons were stained with the fluorescent DNA-binding dye 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI) and quantification of cell death was performed. Stained nuclei were visualized under epifluorescence illumination (340nm excitation and 510nm barrier filter) using a 20× objective. Neurons with condensed and fragmented nuclei were considered apoptotic.

2.3. Electrophysiological recording 

Electrophysiological recording was performed in the conventional whole-cell patch-clamp recording configuration under voltage-clamp conditions. Patch pipettes were pulled from glass capillaries with an outer diameter of 1.5mm on a two-stage puller (PP-830, Narishige). The resistance between the recording electrode filled with pipette solution and the reference electrode was 3–5MΩ. Membrane currents were measured using a patch-clamp amplifier AxonPatch 700B (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA, USA), filtered at 1kHz, sampled and analyzed using a DigiData 1322A interface and a computer with the pClamp 9.0 system (Axon Instruments). The series resistance was compensated automated. The membrane potential was held at −60mV throughout the experiment. All experiments were carried out at room temperature (22 – 25°C).

2.4. Immunohistochemistry 

Rats were anesthetized with chloral hydrate and underwent transcardial perfusion with 0.9% saline followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1M phosphate buffer (PBS). Brains were removed, post-fixed overnight in paraformaldehyde, processed and embedded in paraffin. Coronal brain sections (6-μm thick) were cut on a microtome (Leica RM2155, Nussloch, Germany). Sections were de-paraffinized in xylene and rehydrated in a gradient of ethanol and distilled water. High-temperature antigen retrieval was performed in 1mM citrate buffer. To block endogenous peroxidase activity, sections were incubated for 2h in a solution containing 0.01% sodium azide and 0.1% H2O2 in PBS. To reduce non-specific staining, sections were incubated for 2h in a blocking solution containing 1% BSA, 2% normal goat serum, 0.3% Triton X-100 and 5% non-fat dry milk in PBS. The sections were then incubated in the primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. Alternate sections from each brain were incubated without primary antibody as negative controls. After washes three times in PBS, the sections were incubated for 2h in biotinylated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:200 dilution; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) made up in 0.1% BSA, 0.3% Triton X-100 and 1% normal goat serum in PBS. Sections were washed and incubated with avidin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase (diluted 1:200 in 0.3% Triton X-100) for 1h at 37°C, followed by avidin-biotin-peroxidase (ABC, Vector Laboratorie) at room temperature. The sections were examined with a light microscopy.

2.5. Histology 

In 4-VO ischemic model, rats were anesthetized with chloral hydrate and underwent transcardial perfusion with 0.9% saline followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1M PBS. Brains were removed, post-fixed overnight in paraformaldehyde, processed and embedded in paraffin. Coronal brain sections (6-μm thick) were cut on a microtome. Sections were de-paraffinized in xylene and rehydrated in a gradient of ethanol and distilled water. The sections were stained with Cresyl violet and examined with a light microscope and the neuronal density of the hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells was expressed as the number of cells per 1-mm length counted under a light microscope (400×).

In MCAO ischemic model, the rats were decapitated 24h after reperfusion, and their brains were removed and washed with cold saline. The site of the suture tip and reperfusion of the MCA were visually confirmed by the slight dilatation of the vessel without intraluminal thrombosis. The brains were sliced into 2-mm thick coronal sections. The slices were immersed in saline containing 2% 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) at 37°C in the dark for 30min. Then the stained slices were fixed in 10% formaldehyde. Serial coronal sections were photographed and analyzed by a computer imaging analysis system. The total infarct volume for each brain was calculated by summation of unstained areas of the subsequent slices and multiplying by the thickness. The volume of the damaged hemisphere was calculated respectively. The amount of injury was expressed as a ratio of the total infarct volume to the total volume of the damaged hemisphere.

Other materials and methods used are described in the supplementary data.

Back to Article Outline

3. Results 

3.1. Neuroprotective effect of muscimol or/and baclofen on ischemic cerebral injury in vivo 

Cresy1 violet staining was used to examine the surviving cells of CA1 pyramidal neurons after 5days reperfusion. Normal CA1 pyramidal cells showed round and pale stained nuclei. As shown in Fig. 1A and B, transient cerebral ischemia followed by 5 days of reperfusion induced severe cell death (Fig. 1Ac–d, and B). However, administration of muscimol or baclofen 30min before cerebral ischemia significantly decreased the neuronal degeneration (Fig. 1Ag–j, and B). Moreover, coapplication of muscimol and baclofen significantly increased the survival neurons compared to solely application of muscimol or baclofen (Fig. 1Ai–k, and B). However, vehicle control did not show any protection against the degeneration induced by 5 days of ischemic-reperfusion (Fig. 1Ae–f and B).

  • View full-size image.
  • Fig. 1. 

    Effects of muscimol and/or baclofen on neuronal injury in cerebral ischemia and on infarction size in MCAO model. (A) Cresyl violet staining was performed on the sections from the hippocampi in sham (a, b), and rats subjected to 5 days of reperfusion after 15min of ischemia (c, d), administration of the vehicle (e, f), muscimol (1mg/kg) (g, h), baclofen (20mg/kg) (i, j), muscimol and baclofen (k, l) before ischemia. Treatment with muscimol and/or baclofen significantly increased the number of the survival neurons at 5 days of reperfusion in the CA1 region. (B) Quantitative analysis of the protective effects of muscimol and/or baclofen against ischemic injury. Data were obtained from five independent animals and a typical experiment is presented. Cell density was expressed as the number of cells per 1-mm length of the CA1 pyramidal cells counted under a light microscope. Scale bars: k=400μm; l=10μm. aP<0.05 versus sham control, bP<0.05 versus saline treatment group. cP<0.05 versus muscimol or baclofen treatment group. (C) Muscimol and baclofen reduced the infarction volume in 24h of MCAO rats. The MCA was occluded by a thread inserted through the carotid artery. The animal was sacrificed after 24h, and brain tissue was cut and stained with TTC. The non-stained (white) area indicates infarct size. (D) The amount of injury was expressed as a ratio of the total infarct volume to the total volume of the damaged hemisphere. aP<0.05 versus saline treatment group (n=5 per group).

Second, we examined the effect of muscimol or/and baclofen on the infarction size of rats subjected to MCAO. Fig. 1C and D present the typical results of the effect of MCA occlusion on infarction size from each of the groups: the MCAO, MCAO-vehicle treatment, and muscimol and baclofen coapplication groups. The white-colored areas represent the infarction regions in these sections. As shown in this figure, coapplication of muscimol and baclofen significantly decreased the amount of injury. These results indicate that administration of muscimol and baclofen have significantly neuroprotective effects against ischemic injury.

3.2. Muscimol and baclofen reduced oxygen-glucose deprivation-induced apoptosis-like cell death in vitro 

Hippocampal neurons were pretreated with muscimol and baclofen for the indicated concentration 30min before OGD, and then cells were stained with DAPI. As shown in Fig. 2A and B, coapplication of muscimol and baclofen significantly enhanced the cell viability against oxygen-glucose deprivation in hippocampal neurons in a dose-dependent manner, with maximum level at 15μmol/L. Administration of muscimol and baclofen at concentration of 15μmol/L had no effect on the cell viability without OGD, but significantly decreased the OGD-induced apoptosis-like cells (Fig. 2C and D).

  • View full-size image.
  • Fig. 2. 

    Muscimol and baclofen attenuates oxygen-glucose deprivation-induced neuronal cell death in hippocampal neurons. (A, B) Staining with DAPI (dark blue) allowed the identification of nuclear. Hippocampal neurons were pretreated with muscimol and baclofen for the indicated concentration 30min before OGD. Survival cells were indicated as the percentage of every 300 cells. Cell viability in OGD-induced cultures pretreated with muscimol and baclofen was significantly enhanced compared with controls. aP<0.05 versus I/R 24h group, bP<0.05 versus muscimol+baclofen 1–2μmol/L treatment group, cP<0.05 versus muscimol and baclofen 5μmol/L or 15μmol/L treatment group. (C, D) Muscimol and baclofen applied at concentration of 15μmol/L significantly decreased the OGD-induced apoptosis-like cells. In group b, muscimol and baclofe had no effect on the cell viability without OGD. aP<0.05 versus sham or sham+muscimol+baclofen group, bP<0.05 versus I/R 24h group.

3.3. Cross-inhibition of GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptor with KA receptors in cultured rat hippocampal neurons 

Patch-clamp recording was used to detect the KA receptors-mediated whole-cell currents (IKA) and the effects of GABAA and GABAB receptors’ activators, muscimol (Mus) and baclofen (Bac), on IKA. Muscimol and baclofen induced an intracellular current, and co-application of Mus and Bac with KA evoked the current with an amplitude that was significantly lower than the expected sum of currents evoked by Mus, Bac and KA, respectively (68.7%±3.3%). The results suggested that there was a cross-inhibition between IMus+Bac and IKA(Fig. 3A, B and E). Co-application of Mus with KA also evoked a lower whole-cell currents than the expected sum of Mus and KA (84.8%±5.7%), whereas Bac did not induce whole-cell current and had no obvious effect on IKA(104.7%±9.1%, Fig. 3C–E). Moreover, GABA receptor activators application was followed with KA application to further investigate relationship between GABA receptor and KA receptor (Fig. 3F and G). Following co-application of Mus and Bac or single application of Mus, IKA became much less than control KA receptor-mediated whole-cell currents (56.9%±4.2% and 69.4%±6.4%, respectively).

  • View full-size image.
  • Fig. 3. 

    Cross-inhibition of GABAA and GABAB receptor with KA receptors in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. Co-activation of GABAA and GABAB receptor inhibited KA receptor-mediated whole-cell currents in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. (A) KA-induced whole-cell currents were inhibited by non-NMDA GluR inhibitor CNQX. (B) Cross-inhibition of GABA receptors and KA receptors-mediated whole-cell currents. (C, D, E) Co-application of GABAA receptor activator Mus or GABAB receptor activator Bac with KA induced whole-cell currents. (F) Effects of single activation of GABAA receptors and GABAB receptors on the KA receptor-mediated whole-cell currents. The broken line indicated co-application of Mus and Bac or single application of Mus without KA induced whole-cell currents. (G) Statistic results of GABA receptors’ inhibiting effects on KA receptor-mediated whole-cell currents. All data here are expressed as means±S.D. (n=6). aP<0.05, compared with the expected group, bP<0.05 compared with the group of KA+Mus+Bac, cP<0.05 compared with the group of KA. KA: 100μM; GYKI 52466: 30μM; Mus: muscimol 15μM; Bac: baclofen 15μM.

3.4. Muscimol and/or baclofen suppress the increased assembly of the GluR6-PSD-95-MLK3 signaling module induced by ischemic-reperfusion 

In our previous study, we found that the interaction of GluR6 and MLK3 with PSD-95 reached its peak level at 6h reperfusion after 15min ischemia [7]. Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting were used to examine the association of GluR6 and MLK3 with PSD-95 after 15min ischemia followed by 6h reperfusion in global ischemia model, reciprocal immunoprecipitation experiments were carried out to confirm the results. As shown in Fig. 4A–D, the interaction of GluR6 and MLK3 with PSD-95 increased after 15min ischemia followed by 6h reperfusion. Administration of muscimol and/or baclofen 30min prior to ischemia significantly diminished the increased interaction of GluR6, MLK3 with PSD-95. Meanwhile the protein level of GluR6, PSD-95 and MLK3 were not altered. Note that the effect of coapplication was significant when compared to solely application of either muscimol or baclofen.

  • View full-size image.
  • Fig. 4. 

    Effects of pretreatment with muscimol and/or baclofen on the increased interactions of GluR6 and MLK3 with PSD-95 induced by 6h of reperfusion following cerebral ischemia (I/R 6h) in rat hippocampus. (A, B, C) Co-immunoprecipitation analysis of the interactions among GluR6, PSD-95 and MLK3. Sample proteins were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-GluR6, anti-PSD-95 or anti-MLK3 antibody and then blotted (IB) with anti-PSD-95, anti-MLK3 or anti-GluR6 antibody. (D) Quantitative representation of interactions of GluR6 and PSD-95 with MLK3. Values are represented as means±S.D. for four independent experiments (n=4). aP<0.05 versus sham; bP<0.05 versus saline treatment; cP<0.05 versus muscimol or baclofen treatment group.

3.5. Muscimol and/or baclofen inhibit the activation of MLK3, MKK4/7 and JNK3 during reperfusion after cerebral ischemia 

Previous studies indicated that MLK3, an upstream kinase of MKK4/7 and JNK3, could be activated via GluR6 and PSD-95 [7]. As shown in Fig. 5A and B, 6h reperfusion after 15min ischemia resulted in remarkable increase in the phosphorylation of MLK3. Pretreatment of muscimol and/or baclofen significantly diminished the increase in the phosphorylation of MLK3, while the protein level of MLK3 was not changed. The same dose of control vehicle did not affect the increased phosphorylation of MLK3. Results of western blotting revealed that activation of MKK4/7 was significantly suppressed by application of the muscimol and/or baclofen (Fig. 5C and D). Our previous studies have shown that JNK3 is significantly activated with two peaks at 30min and 3 days of reperfusion after transient cerebral ischemia [7]. The latter peaks are considered to account for delayed neuronal death because prolonged JNK activation above a threshold might be required for brain cell death. We then investigated the phosphorylation of JNK3 at 3 days of reperfusion. Results revealed that activation of JNK3 was significantly suppressed by application of the muscimol and/or baclofen (Fig. 5E and F).

  • View full-size image.
  • Fig. 5. 

    Effects of muscimol and/or baclofen on the activation of MLK3, MKK4/7 and JNK3 in the hippocampal CA1 region after cerebral ischemia. (A, C, E) Extracts from the CA1 region were subjected to immunoblotting analysis with anti-p-MLK3, anti-MLK3, anti-p-MKK4/7, anti-MKK4/7, anti-p-JNK3 and anti-JNK3 antibodies, respectively. (B, D, F) Data are expressed as means±S.D. derived from four independent animals (n=4). aP<0.05 versus sham group; bP<0.05 versus saline treatment group; cP<0.05 versus muscimol or baclofen treatment group.

3.6. Muscimol and/or Baclofen inhibit the activation of c-Jun and the expression of Fas-L induced by ischemic-reperfusion 

Our previous studies indicated that p-c-Jun could be activated to reach its peak level at 6h reperfusion after 15min ischemia [10]. Western blotting was used to examine the phosphorylation of c-Jun. As shown in Fig. 6A and B, muscimol and/or baclofen can significantly prevented the increased c-Jun activation induced by ischemia, without significant effects on the expression of c-Jun, which was confirmed by the result of immunohistochemistry (Fig. 6C).

  • View full-size image.
  • Fig. 6. 

    Effects of muscimol and/or baclofen on the increased c-Jun phosphorylation and protein level of Fas-L in the hippocampal CA1 region after cerebral ischemia. (A, D) Phosphorylation of c-Jun and the protein levels of c-Jun, Fas-L and Fas were examined by immunoblotting analysis with the indicated antibody. (B, E) Bands on Western blots were scanned and the intensities were expressed as folds versus sham treatment. Values are represented as means±S.D. for four independent experiments (n=4). aP<0.05 versus sham group; bP<0.05 versus saline treatment group; cP<0.05 versus muscimol or baclofen treatment group. (C, F) Immunohistochemistry analysis of the phosphorylation of c-Jun and the expression of Fas-L in coronal sections of hippocampi at 6h of reperfusion. Representative results on five independent experiments (n=5) were shown from immunohistochemical staining sections of the hippocampi from sham operated rats (a, e), rats subjected to 15min of ischemia followed by 6h of reperfusion (c, d), and rats with administration of vehicle (e, f), muscimol (g, h), baclofen (i, j), muscimol and baclofen (k, l) 30min before ischemia. Boxed areas in left column are shown at higher magnification in right column. Scale bar: k=400μm, l=10μm.

Further more, the expression of Fas-L and Fas were analyzed by western blotting. As indicated in Fig. 6D and E, the expression of Fas-L was significantly increased 6h after reperfusion. However, application of muscimol and/or baclofen could diminish the increased expression of Fas-L induced by cerebral ischemic-reperfusion.The same dose of control vehicle did not affect the increase on the expression of Fas-L. The protein level of Fas was not affected. As shown in Fig. 6F, the results of immunohistochemistry also revealed that weak Fas-L immunoreactivity was detected in the cytosol of hippocampal CA1 in the sham group (Fig. 6Fa–b). On the contrary, Fas-L immunoreactivity was significantly increased after 6h reperfusion (Fig. 6Fc–d) compared with the sham group. No inhibitory effects of control vehicle on Fas-L immunoreactivity were detected (Fig. 6Fe–f). However, Fas-L immunoreactivity after 6h reperfusion was significantly inhibited by application of muscimol and/or baclofen (Fig. 6Fg–l).

Further results are included in the supplementary data.

Back to Article Outline

4. Discussion 

The goal of the present study was to evaluate whether stimulation of GABA receptors has neuroprotective effects and the potential mechanisms underlying these effects. Because now there are conflicting evidence about those activating GABA receptors is directly neuroprotective. Activation of GABA receptors has been said to be protective [11], [12], [13] or not [14]. However, our data presented in this study demonstrate that pretreatment either with muscimol (GABA(A) receptor agonist) or baclofen (GABA(B) receptor agonist) has neuroprotective effects either in vivo or in vitro, and the coapplication is more effective than single use. Muscimol and baclofen are two currently used agonists. Both agonists have been tested in experiment ischemia models, and show neuroprotective effects, respectively [15], [16]. In the present work, cerebral ischemic model including global cerebral ischemia and focal cerebral ischemia (MCAO) in vivo, and OGD model of primary cultured hippocampal neurons in vitro were adopted to further test the neuroprotective effects of inhibitory GABA signal. We report for the first time that GABA receptors stimulation can diminish the increased association of PSD-95 with GluR6 and MLK3 induced by global ischemia, inhibit the activation of MLK3/JNK3/c-Jun pathway, the Bcl-2 phosphorylation, the expression of Fas-L, the releases of Bax from Bcl-2/Bax dimmers and cytochrome c from mitochondria, and the activation of Caspase 3 during reperfusion after cerebral ischemia. The neuroprotective effects of muscimol and/or baclofen were significant when applied both in vivo and in vitro. Moreover, electrophysiological recording showed that kainate receptor (KAR)-mediated whole-cell currents could be inhibited by co-activation of GABA receptors in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. Taken together, these results suggest that activation of GABA receptors have neuroprotective effects when both agonists were applied solely or together.

The normal functions of brain depend on the dynamic balance of excitation and inhibition. However, cerebral ischemia can both induce the increase of excitation and the decrease of inhibition, which leads to neuronal exitotoxicity. Recently, we found that JNK activation induced by the GluR6-PSD-95-MLK3 module via KAR play a causal role in cerebral ischemia [7], [8]. In the present study, we firstly find that elevating the inhibition of GABA receptors can significantly decrease KAR-mediated excitation after ischemic-reperfusion. The major finding is that Muscimol and/or Baclofen can suppress the assembly of the GluR6-PSD-95-MLK3 signaling module during reperfusion after cerebral ischemia. One possible explanation is that the activation of GABA(A) receptor by muscimol can induce the hyperpolarization of postsynaptic nrurons via activating ligand-gated Cl-channels, which decrease the depolarization of the neurons [17], and activation of G-protein-coupled GABA(B) receptor by baclofen can attenuate glutamate release from presynaptic neurons [18]. The inhibition of excitation after GABA receptors activation may thereby attenuate the increased association of PSD-95 with GluR6 and MLK3 induced by ischemic excitotoxicity.

Previous studies have provided a detailed characterization of presynaptic and postsynaptic inhibitory actions of GABA(B) receptors in the hippocampus [19], [20]. Presynaptically located GABA(B) receptors modulate neurotransmitter release by depressing Ca2+ influx [21], while postsynaptic GABA(B) receptors is primarily mediated by G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying K+ channels[22]. The widely distributed GABA(B) protein throughout the hippocampal formation suggest a underlying cross-talk and mutual regulation between GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors. Indeed, numerous reports illustrate that GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors can mutually influence each other’s ligand binding properties [23], [24] and signaling activity [23], [25], [26], [27]. Recently, Balasubramanian et al. [28] found that GABA(B) receptors and GABA(A) receptor subunits are physically associated in native brain tissue. GABA(B)R1 surface expression can increase the potency of GABA(A) receptors, and GABA(A) receptor γ2S subunit promotes GABA(B)R1 cell surface expression in the absence of GABABR2. These data suggest that agonist activation of GABA receptors can be mutually modulated by the association between these two different classes of GABA receptor. Additionally, Kulinskii and Mikhel’son [29] have found that GABA(B) receptors agonist baclofen and GABA(A) receptors agonists THIP and muscimol are additively contribute to the improvement of brain resistance to global ischemia. As to our findings in present study that coapplication of GABA(B) receptors and GABA(A) receptors agonists are more effective than solely used, our observations further suggest that these two receptor types may cooperate to produce inhibitory synaptic transmission.

Further discussion is included in the supplementary data.

Back to Article Outline

Acknowledgements 

This work was supported by grants from the Grant research Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 90608015); The Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30330190); and Education Departmental Nature Science Research Funds of Jiangsu Province of China (06KJB180116 and 07KJA18030).

Back to Article Outline

Appendix A. Supplementary data 

  • View full-size image.
  • Figure 7. 

    Effects of muscimol and/or baclofen on the altered phosphorylation of Bcl-2, interactions of Bcl-2 with Bax and release of cytochrome c. (A) Samples of hippocampal CA1 were examined by immunoblotting analysis with the anti-p-Bcl-2 antibody or anti-Bcl-2 antibody at 6h ischemic reperfusion (I/R6h). (C) Co-immunoprecipitation analysis of interactions between Bcl-2 and Bax, and the total Bax expression. (E) Effects of muscimol and/or baclofen on the expression of cytochrome c induced by 6h of reperfusion following transient brain ischemia (I/R6h) in cytosol and mitochondria of hippocampal CA1. (B, D, F) Data are represented as means±S.D. for four independent experiments (n=4). P<0.05 versus sham group; P<0.05 versus saline treatment group; P<0.05 versus muscimol or baclofen treatment group.

  • View full-size image.
  • Figure 8. 

    Fig. 8. Effects of pretreatment with muscimol and/or baclofen on the activation of Caspase 3, and on the apoptotic neuronal death induced by severe ischemia, as shown by TUNEL staining in the hippocampal CA1 region after cerebral ischemia. (A) Extracts from the CA1 region were subjected to immunoblotting analysis with anti-cleaved Caspase 3 antibody after administration of muscimol and/or baclofen or vehicle. (B) Data are expressed as means±S.D. derived from four independent animals (n=4). P<0.05 versus sham group; P<0.05 versus saline treatment group; P<0.05 versus muscimol or baclofen treatment group. (C) Immunohistochemical staining of Caspase 3 in coronal sections of hippocampus. Example of immunohistochemical staining sections of the hippocampi from sham operated rats (a, b) and rats subjected to 15min of ischemia followed by 6h of reperfusion (c, d), and rats with administration of vehicle (e, f), muscimol (g, h), baclofen (i, j), muscimol and baclofen (k, l) 30min before ischemia. Data were obtained from six independent animals in each experimental group, and the results of a typical experiment are presented. Boxed areas in left column are shown at higher magnification in right column. Scale bar: k=400μm, l=10μm. (D) Representative hippocampal photomicrographs of TUNEL staining counterstained with methyl green. Rats were subjected to sham operated (a, b) and 15min of ischemia followed by 3 day of reperfusion (c, d ), and rats with administration of vehicle (e, f), muscimol (g, h), baclofen (i, j), muscimol and baclofen (k, l) 30min before ischemia. Data were obtained from six independent animals and the results of a typical experiment are presented. Boxed areas in left column are shown at higher magnification in right column. Scale bar: k=400μm, l=10μm.

Supplementary data.

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Allen NJ, Rossi DJ, Attwell D. Sequential release of GABA by exocytosis and reversed uptake leads to neuronal swelling in simulated ischemia of hippocampal slices. J. Neurosci. 2004;24:3837–3849
  2. Doepner RF, et al. Insights into GABA receptor signalling in TM3 Leydig cells. Neuroendocrinology. 2005;81:381–390
  3. Johansen FF, Diemer NH. Enhancement of GABA neurotransmission after cerebral ischemia in the rat reduces loss of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells. Acta Neurol. Scand. 1991;84:1–6
  4. Shuaib A, Ijaz S, Hasan S, Kalra J. Gamma-vinyl GABA prevents hippocampal and substantia nigra reticulata damage in repetitive transient forebrain ischemia. Brain Res. 1992;590:13–17
  5. Sternau LL, Lust WD, Ricci AJ, Ratcheson R. Role for gamma-aminobutyric acid in selective vulnerability in gerbils. Stroke. 1989;20:281–287
  6. Rosenbaum DM, Grotta JC, Pettigrew LC, Ostrow P, Strong R, Rhoades H, et al. Baclofen does not protect against cerebral ischemia in rats. Stroke. 1990;21:138–140
  7. Tian H, Zhang QG, Zhu GX, Pei DS, Guan QH, Zhang GY. Activation of c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase 3 is mediated by the GluR6.PSD-95.MLK3 signaling module following cerebral ischemia in rat hippocampus. Brain Res. 2005;1061:57–66
  8. Pei DS, Guan QH, Sun YF, Zhang QX, Xu TL, Zhang GY. Neuroprotective effects of GluR6 antisense oligodeoxynucleotides on transient brain ischemia/reperfusion-induced neuronal death in rat hippocampal CA1 region. J. Neurosci. Res. 2005;82:642–649
  9. Pan J, Zhang QG, Zhang GY. The neuroprotective effects of K252a through inhibiting MLK3/MKK7/JNK3 signaling pathway on ischemic brain injury in rat hippocampal CA1 region. Neuroscience. 2005;131:147–159
  10. Zhang QG, Wang RM, Yin XH, Pan J, Xu TL, Zhang GY. Knock-down of POSH expression is neuroprotective through down-regulating activation of the MLK3-MKK4-JNK pathway following cerebral ischaemia in the rat hippocampal CA1 subfield. J. Neurochem. 2005;95:784–795
  11. Muir JK, Lobner D, Monyer H, Choi DW. GABAA receptor activation attenuates excitotoxicity but exacerbates oxygen-glucose deprivation-induced neuronal injury in vitro. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1996;16:1211–1218
  12. Ohkuma S, Chen SH, Katsura M, Chen DZ, Kuriyama K. Muscimol prevents neuronal injury induced by NMDA. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 1994;64:125–128
  13. Lyden PD. GABA and neuroprotection. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 1997;40:233–258
  14. Erdo SL, Michler A. GABA does not protect cerebro-cortical cultures against excitotoxic cell death. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1990;182:203–206
  15. Lyden PD, Lonzo L. Combination therapy protects ischemic brain in rats. A glutamate antagonist plus a gamma-aminobutyric acid agonist. Stroke. 1994;25:189–196
  16. Jackson-Friedman C, Lyden PD, Nunez S, Jin A, Zweifler R. High dose baclofen is neuroprotective but also causes intracerebral hemorrhage: a quantal bioassay study using the intraluminal suture occlusion method. Exp. Neurol. 1997;147:346–352
  17. Attwell D, Barbour B, Szatkowski M. Nonvesicular release of neurotransmitter. Neuron. 1993;11:401–407
  18. Moldavan MG, Irwin RP, Allen CN. Presynaptic GABA(B) receptors regulate retinohypothalamic tract synaptic transmission by inhibiting voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. J. Neurophysiol. 2006;95:3727–3741
  19. Dutar P, Nicoll RA. A physiological role for GABAB receptors in the central nervous system. Nature. 1988;332:156–158
  20. Dutar P, Nicoll RA. Pre- and postsynaptic GABAB receptors in the hippocampus have different pharmacological properties. Neuron. 1988;1:585–591
  21. Scholz KP, Miller RJ. GABAB receptor-mediated inhibition of Ca2+ currents and synaptic transmission in cultured rat hippocampal neurones. J. Physiol. 1991;444:669–686
  22. Luscher C, Jan LY, Stoffel M, Malenka RC, Nicoll RA. G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying K+ channels (GIRKs) mediate postsynaptic but not presynaptic transmitter actions in hippocampal neurons. Neuron. 1997;19:687–695
  23. Kardos J, Elster L, Damgaard I, Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Schousboe A. Role of GABAB receptors in intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis and possible interaction between GABAA and GABAB receptors in regulation of transmitter release in cerebellar granule neurons. J. Neurosci. Res. 1994;39:646–655
  24. Kardos J. Recent advances in GABA research. Neurochem. Int. 1999;34:353–358
  25. Shibuya I, Kongsamut S, Douglas WW. Both GABAA and GABAB receptors participate in suppression of [CA2+]i pulsing in toad melanotrophs. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1997;321:241–246
  26. Barila B, Cupello A, Robello M. GABA(B) receptor activation protects GABA(A) receptor from cyclic AMP-dependent down-regulation in rat cerebellar granule cells. Neuroscience. 1999;93:1077–1082
  27. Obrietan K, van den Pol AN. GABAB receptor-mediated inhibition of GABAA receptor calcium elevations in developing hypothalamic neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 1998;79:1360–1370
  28. Balasubramanian S, Teissere JA, Raju DV, Hall RA. Hetero-oligomerization between GABAA and GABAB receptors regulates GABAB receptor trafficking. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:18840–18850
  29. Kulinskii VI, Mikhel’son GV. Additivity and independence of neuroprotective effects of GABAA and GABAB receptor agonists in complete global cerebral ischemia. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2000;130:772–774

PII: S0014-5793(08)00155-5

doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2008.02.044

FEBS Letters
Volume 582, Issue 9 , Pages 1298-1306, 16 April 2008