FEBS Letters
Volume 582, Issue 13 , Pages 1816-1820, 11 June 2008

Homotropic allosteric control in clostridial glutamate dehydrogenase: Different mechanisms for glutamate and NAD+?

Edited by Stuart Ferguson

School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

Received 29 February 2008; received in revised form 18 April 2008; accepted 24 April 2008. published online 08 May 2008.

Abstract 

Clostridial glutamate dehydrogenase mutants with the 5 Trp residues in turn replaced by Phe showed the importance of Trp 64 and 449 in cooperativity with glutamate at pH 9. These mutants are examined here for their behaviour with NAD+ at pH 7.0 and 9.0. The wild-type enzyme displays negative NAD+ cooperativity at both pH values. At pH 7.0 W243F gives Michaelis–Menten kinetics, and the same behaviour is shown by W243F and also W310F at pH 9.0, but not by W64F or W449F. W243 and W310 are apparently much more important than W64 and W449 for the coenzyme negative cooperativity, implying that different conformational transitions are involved in cooperativity with the coenzyme and with glutamate.

Abbreviations: GDH, glutamate dehydrogenase (NAD+-dependent) EC 1.4.1.2, h, Hill coefficient

Keywords: Glutamate dehydrogenase, Negative cooperativity, Allosteric mechanism, Trp/Phe mutants, Homotropic interaction, Site-directed mutagenesis, Hill coefficients

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0014-5793(08)00380-3

doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2008.04.049

FEBS Letters
Volume 582, Issue 13 , Pages 1816-1820, 11 June 2008