| | The N-terminal domain of human holocarboxylase synthetase facilitates biotinylation via direct interaction with the substrate proteinEdited by Gianni Cesareni Received 10 November 2009; received in revised form 21 December 2009; accepted 26 December 2009. published online 18 January 2010. Abstract Human holocarboxylase synthetase shows a high degree of sequence homology in the catalytic domain with bacterial biotin ligases such as Escherichia coli BirA, but differs in the length and sequence of the N-terminus. Despite several studies having been undertaken on the N-terminal region of hHCS, the role of this region remains unclear. We determined the structure of the N-terminal domain of hHCS by limited proteolysis and showed that this domain has a crucial effect on the enzymatic activity. The domain interacts not only with biotin acceptor protein, but also with the catalytic domain of hHCS, as shown by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments. We propose that the N-terminal domain of hHCS recognizes the charged region of biotin acceptor protein, distinctly from the recognition by the catalytic domain. 1. Introduction  Biotin (vitamin H) is an indispensible cofactor that is synthesized by plants and most prokaryotes and is required by all organisms. In cells, biotin is covalently attached at a specific lysine residue in the biotin-dependent enzymes [1]. These enzymes generally capture CO2 from bicarbonate and catalyze the transfer of this carboxylate to organic acids to form various cellular metabolites using the biotin cofactor as a mobile carboxyl carrier [2]. Biotin protein ligase (BPL), also referred to as BirA in Escherichia coli [3] and holocarboxylase synthetase (HCS) in eukaryotes [4], participates in the binding of biotin to the cognate proteins. For all BPLs, the addition of biotin occurs via the following two-step process. In the first step, BPL catalyzes the conversion of biotin to biotinyl-5′-AMP at the expense of ATP. In the second step, the biotinyl group binds to the apocarboxylase via the specific lysine ε-amino group. The open reading frame of full-length human HCS encodes a protein of 726 amino acids with a molecular weight of 81 kDa [5]. However, the existence of at least three splicing variants has been confirmed [6]. Human HCS has five different endogenous substrates: acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 and 2 (ACC1 and ACC2), pyruvate carboxylase (PC), 3-methylcrotonyl-CoA carboxylase (MCC) and propionyl-CoA carboxylase (PCC). These enzymes are involved in various cellular metabolic reactions in gluconeogenesis, lipogenesis, amino acid metabolism and energy transduction [7], [8]. A deficiency in human HCS results in decreased activity of these carboxylases and affects various metabolic processes. Unlike monofunctional BPLs, it has been suggested that the structure of bifunctional microbial and eukaryotic BPLs is composed of three main regions: the N-terminal region, a central region that is required for the catalytic function and the small C-terminal region. The catalytic domain of prokaryotic BPL was first characterized using the crystal structure of the E. coli BirA complex with the product analog, biotinyllysine [9]. Subsequently, the catalytic domains of other species were suggested from sequence homology with E. coli BirA. This sequence also shows significant homology with sequences in the C-terminal half of eukaryotic BPLs, suggesting that this region can be identified as the catalytic domain. The small C-terminal region of BirA is known to be essential for the catalytic activity and the interaction with its substrates, ATP and BCCP [10]. Recently, it has been reported that the small C-terminal region (669H-718R) of human HCS plays a role in substrate recognition [11]. The N-terminal region of E. coli BirA contains a winged helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motif [9], [12]. This provides BirA with an additional function as a repressor of transcription initiation at the biotin biosynthetic operon [3], [13], rendering this protein bifunctional. Sudha et al. classified the prokaryotic BPLs into two groups according to the N-terminal helix-turn-helix (HTH) domain. Group I is a monofunctional enzymes that lack the sequences corresponding to the N-terminal DNA-binding domain and Group II is a bifunctional enzymes that have a repressor function in the N-terminal regulatory domain like E. coli BirA [14]. More recently, Novichkov et al. combined comparative genomics and experimental techniques to identify the bifunctional enzymes with DNA binding domains [15]. In plant, the N-terminal region of BPL contains a chloroplast-targeting sequence [16]. The N-terminal region of yeast BPL is known to be necessary for complete catalytic function [17]. Although residues 448–701 in human HCS are homologous to the catalytic domain of E. coli BirA, the amino acid sequence of the N-terminal region (1M-447S) of human HCS is distinct from that of E. coli BirA. Evidence for the functional importance of this region comes from the identification of mutations in human HCS responsible for inherited metabolic disease, multiple carboxylase deficiency (MCD). HCS containing several point mutations in N-terminal region has been shown to be “biotin responsive” in expression experiments and has been shown to be defective in biotin binding affinity [18], [19]. It has been speculated that the N-terminal region of human HCS might play roles in gene regulation, protein-protein interaction and substrate recognition [6], [11], [18]. However, little is known about the function of this large additional N-terminal region. Here, we have identified the structure of the N-terminal domain of human HCS (hHCS) using limited proteolysis and demonstrated that this region can rescue the defect of enzymatic activity that is caused by the deletion of the N-terminal region. The N-terminal domain interacts not only with the biotin acceptor protein, but also with the remainder of hHCS, including the catalytic domain. Furthermore, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) binding studies with the biotinoyl domain of human ACC2 showed that the charged surface of the biotinoyl domain was recognized by the hHCS N-terminal domain. This has yielded structural insights into the role of the N-terminal domain of hHCS. 2. Materials and methods  3. Results and discussion  3.1. Structural characterization of the N-terminal region of hHCS Purified intact hHCS was subjected to limited proteolysis with several proteases to define the structural boundaries of the N-terminal domain within the enzyme. The protein was treated with subtilisin, proteinase K and chymotrypsin, and the products were analyzed using SDS–PAGE (Supplementary Fig. S1A). All three proteases generated a fragment of about 65 kDa, which contained the C terminus, as identified by Western blotting against the His-tag antibody (data not shown). N-terminal sequencing of these products revealed that the cleavage occurred between 126E and 127N for subtilisin, between 127N and 128I for proteinase K, and between 100H and 101L for chymotrypsin (Supplementary Fig. S1B). This result indicates that the protein contains a protease-sensitive region between residues 100 and 130. Polyak et al. [17] have demonstrated the sensitivity of the enzyme to protease cleavage using yeast BPL, and they identified a protease sensitive site between Lys 240–Asn 260 in yeast BPL. A flexible region, located between residues 240–260, divides yeast BPL into a 27 kDa N-terminal domain and a 50 kDa C-terminal domain. Similarly, our limited proteolysis study of purified full-length hHCS has provided information that has identified an N-terminal domain similar to that of yeast BPL. In addition, based on analyses of the secondary structure (http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/psipred and http://ffas.burnham.org/XtalPred), the residues from 130 to 160 are predicted to form a random structure, whereas the residues from 160 to the C-terminus are predicted to form a folded structure. Together with the limited proteolysis results, the secondary structure prediction suggests that the N-terminal residues (1–160) form a domain that is independent from the remaining part of human HCS. Therefore, in this study, we designed an N-terminally truncated HCS starting at Ala 161 (161-HCS) and we assigned the N-terminal domain as the fragment from Met 1 to Lys 160 (NTD–HCS). To characterize the structure of the N-terminal domain of hHCS, we expressed and purified the N-terminal 160 residues (NTD–HCS) in an E. coli system. The amide protons in the heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) spectrum of 15N-labeled NTD–HCS appeared in the region from 8.0–8.5 ppm, and this is characteristic of a random coiled structure (Supplementary Fig. S2). The CD spectrum showed a strong negative peak below 200 nm, which is characteristic of a random coil configuration, and a negative peak around 222 nm, suggesting some content of α-helicity (Supplementary Fig. S3). Using the CDNN program [21], we estimated the secondary structure of the NTD–HCS to be mainly random coil, with some α-helical structure, consistent with the result of secondary structure prediction mentioned above. NTD–HCS has a large number of charged residues (Lys, Arg, Glu, and Asp) and there are 12 proline residues that are distributed randomly in the sequence. Thus, we assume the N-terminal domain to have mainly a random coil structure with some α-helical content. 3.2. The activity of full-length and N-terminally truncated hHCS When the apo-biotinoyl domain is biotinylated to form the holo-protein, the chemical shifts of the residues that are located near Lys 929 are changed significantly (Fig. 1A). To compare with the activity of hHCS, we analyzed the biotinylation of the human ACC2 biotinoyl domain (hACC75) by NMR in the presence of either full-length hHCS (FL-HCS) or N-terminally truncated hHCS (161-HCS) containing the catalytic domain. After 5 h reaction with FL-HCS, the 1H–15N HSQC spectrum of hACC75 showed full conversion of the biotinoyl domain to its holo-form (Fig. 1B). However, using 161-HCS, the signals from apo-hACC75 still showed substantial intensities (Fig. 1C), indicating that the enzymatic activity of 161-HCS was decreased significantly by the N-terminal truncation. Even after 12 h, although the intensities were greatly reduced, the peaks corresponding to apo-hACC75 remained, showing that the NMR signals from the apo-protein coexisted with those of the holo-protein (Fig. 1D). These results indicate that the enzymatic activity of 161-HCS was significantly reduced by the truncation of the 160 N-terminal residues. When the biotinylation reactions were monitored using avidin blots, similar reaction rates were observed. hACC75 was biotinylated by FL-HCS, yielding saturation bands on an avidin blot between 3 and 6 h (Fig. 2A). However, when 161-HCS was used in the biotinylation reaction, the band corresponding to the biotinylated contents did not reach saturation at 6 h after the start of the reaction. This result also indicates that removal of the N-terminal domain reduces hHCS activity significantly. Similar to our findings, N-terminally truncated BPL in yeast showed a 3500-fold reduction in activity [17], and the authors proposed that the presence of the N-terminal domain is necessary to produce a functional enzyme. They assumed that in the absence of the N-terminal domain, the conformational changes that are associated with substrate binding and are necessary for enzymatic activity may occur at a slower rate than in the presence of the N-terminal domain. Therefore, the overall activity of the protein will be affected [17]. Furthermore, although a shorter deletion of 79 amino acids results in a fully active hHCS, the enzymes that began at Leu 165 or Leu 166 did not show any activity in the in vitro assay [18]. Our findings that the absence of the N-terminal domain causes a significant defect in the activity of hHCS are consistent with these results. 3.3. The effect of NTD–HCS on the biotinylation activity As mentioned above, the N-terminally truncated version of hHCS has defective activity. To investigate the potential role of NTD–HCS on enzyme activity, we carried out the biotinylation using 161-HCS in the presence of NTD–HCS. The avidin blotting for the biotinylation reaction using purified NTD–HCS did not show any bands, implying that, as expected, it is unable to biotinylate the biotin acceptor domain of human ACC2, hACC75 (Fig. 2C). To our surprise, however, the addition of NTD–HCS to the reaction mixture containing 161-HCS at a 1:1 molar ratio showed full biotinylation activity in vitro, as does full-length hHCS (Fig. 2D and E). This result indicates that the NTD–HCS has a critical functional role that can rescue the N-terminal truncation of hHCS with respect to the catalytic reaction with 161-HCS. Several studies of human HCS have proposed that the N-terminal domain contributes to biotinylation and that it may affect acceptor substrate recognition. Previously, it was shown that various N-terminal deletion constructs of HCS that were prepared by expression of exonuclease digestion products of the gene had different abilities to biotinylate substrates (the biotinoyl domain of propionyl-CoA carboxylase and E. coli BCCP). This implied that disruption of the N-terminal domain interferes with the biotin transfer reaction [18]. Furthermore, yeast-two-hybrid (Y2H) assays suggested that this N-terminal region (1M-446F) may be involved in substrate recognition [11]. More recently, Ingaramo and Beckett demonstrated that the N-terminus (1M-57G) affects the kinetics [5]. Based on our results, and considering that the NTD–HCS can rescue the catalytic function of the N-terminal truncation (even though it is not attached to the main body of the enzyme), it is clear that NTD–HCS plays a cooperative role in the catalytic function with the catalytic domain. We suggested that there is a functional interaction with either the biotin acceptor protein or the catalytic domain. 3.4. The interaction of NTD–HCS with the substrate and the core domain of hHCS To investigate the interaction of NTD–HCS with the remaining part of hHCS and/or the substrate biotinoyl domain, we performed NMR CSPs experiments in the presence of 161-HCS or hACC75. The addition of 161-HCS (including the catalytic domain) to NTD–HCS induced weak chemical shift changes in the 1H–15N HSQC spectra, and several signals were broadened (Fig. 3B). This result indicates that NTD–HCS interacts directly with 161-HCS with weak affinity. CSPs were also observed when titrating hACC75 with NTD–HCS (Fig. 3C). These results indicated that NTD–HCS can interact directly with both 161-HCS and hACC75. The chemical shift changes of representative signals are shown in the enlarged spectra that are shown in Fig. 3D, indicating the concentration dependency of hACC75. Interestingly, when hACC75 was added to the N-terminal domain, many cross peaks became more intense rather than broadened (Fig. 3C). This result implies that the chemical exchange rate of NTD–HCS in solution was affected by the titration of hACC75, resulting in the appearance of new signals and higher intensities of the NMR signals (possibly due to faster or slower conformational exchange). We suggested that when NTD–HCS binds to the substrate, some conformational change in NTD–HCS occurs. 3.5. Recognition of the hACC75-binding surface by NTD–HCS To understand how NTD–HCS interacts with the biotin acceptor protein (hACC75), we conducted CSP experiments, comparing NTD–HCS and the N-terminally truncated enzyme (161-HCS). We analyzed changes in the binding site of hACC75 that occurred on the addition of NTD–HCS and 161-HCS. Fig. 4 presents the CSPs together with the residue number and the mapping of the binding surfaces of hACC75 in each experiment. The residues on the surface of hACC75 that were perturbed due to the addition of 161-HCS were essentially the same as those that were perturbed by the addition of FL-HCS (data not shown). The results indicate the key residues that are involved in the binding, including the MKM motif and glutamic acid residues. However, the addition of NTD–HCS induced the perturbation of NMR signals that are associated with charged residues on the surface of hACC75, and this is distinct from the result with 161-HCS. It is notable that NTD–HCS can interact with the different surfaces of hACC75 and 161-HCS, suggesting a cooperative interaction with 161-HCS. Together with the result that indicates the recovery of the biotinylation activity from the N-terminal truncation by the addition of NTD–HCS, this result implies that NTD–HCS may recruit the substrate to facilitate the biotinylation reaction. In conclusion, we have determined the structure of the N-terminal domain of hHCS by limited proteolysis and demonstrated that this region interacts with both the core body of hHCS that contains the catalytic domain and the biotin acceptor. Furthermore, the CSP experiments suggest that the charge-charge interaction contributes to the recognition of the biotin acceptor protein by the N-terminal domain of hHCS. These results may provide structural insights into the substrate recognition by the N-terminal region of hHCS. Acknowledgements  We greatly appreciate the gift of a cDNA clone encoding human HCS from Dr. Yoichi Suzuki. This work was supported by grant from High Field NMR Research Program of Korea Basic Science Institute (to Y.H.J.). Appendix A. Supplementary data  Supplementary data. Supplementary data contains supplementary figures. References  [1]. [1]Knowles JR. The mechanism of biotin-dependent enzymes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1989;58:195–221. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
[2]. [2]Chapman-Smith A, Cronan JE. Molecular biology of biotin attachment to proteins. J. Nutr. 1999;129:447–484. [3]. [3]Cronan JE. The E. coli bio operon: transcriptional repression by an essential protein modification enzyme. Cell. 1989;58:427–429. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
[4]. [4]Diana PA, Sergio SV, Alfonso LDR. Biotin in metabolism and its relationship to human disease. Arch. Med. Res. 2002;33:439–447. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (160 KB)
|
CrossRef
[5]. [5]Ingaramo M, Beckett D. The distinct N-termini of two human HCS isoforms influence biotin acceptor substrate recognition. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:30862–30870.
CrossRef
[6]. [6]Hiratsuka M, Sakamoto O, Li X, Suzuki Y, Aoki Y, Narisawa K. Identification of holocarboxylase synthetase (HCS) proteins in human placenta. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1998;1385:165–171. MEDLINE [7]. [7]Wood HG, Barden RE. Biotin enzymes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1977;46:385–413. MEDLINE [8]. [8]Burri BJ, Sweetman L, Nyhan WL. Mutant holocarboxylase synthetase: evidence for the enzyme defect in early infantile biotin-responsive multiple carboxylase deficiency. J. Clin. Invest. 1981;68:1491–1495. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
[9]. [9]Wilson KP, Shewchuk LM, Brennan RG, Otsuka AJ, Mattews BW. Escherichia coli biotin holoenzyme synthetase/bio repressor crystal structure delineates the biotin- and DNA-binding domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:9257–9261. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
[10]. [10]Chapman-smith A, Mulhern TD, Whelan F, Cronan JC, Wallace JC. The C-terminal domain of biotin protein ligase from E. coli is required for catalytic activity. Protein Sci. 2001;10:2608–2617. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
[11]. [11]Hassan YI, Moriyama H, Olsen LJ, Bi X, Zempleni J. N- and C-terminal domains in human holocarboxylase synthetase participate in substrate recognition. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2009;96:183–188.
CrossRef
[12]. [12]Weaver LH, Kwon K, Beckett D, Mattews BW. Corepressor-induced organization and assembly of the biotin repressor: a model for allosteric activation of a transcriptional regulator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:6045–6050. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
[13]. [13]Beckett D, Mattews BW. Escherichia coli repressor of biotin biosynthesis. Methods Enzymol. 1997;279:362–376. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
[14]. [14]Sudha P, Garima G, Richa S, Vasanthakumar GR, Avadhesha S. Ligand specificity of group 1 biotin protein ligase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLos ONE. 2008;3:e2320. [15]. [15]Novichkov PS, Laikova ON, Novichkova ES, Gelfand MS, Arkin AP, Dubchak I, et al. RegPrecise: a database of curated genomic inferences of transcriptional regulatory interactions in prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:D111–D118.
CrossRef
[16]. [16]Tissot G, Douce R, Alban C. Evidence for multiple forms of biotin holocarboxylase synthetase in pea (Pisum sativum) and in Arabidopsis thaliana: subcellular fractionation studies and isolation of a cDNA clone. Biochem. J. 1997;323:179–188. [17]. [17]Polyak SW, Chapman-Smith A, Brautigan PJ, Wallace JC. Biotin protein ligase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The N-terminal domain is required for complete activity. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:32847–32854. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
[18]. [18]Campeau E, Gravel RA. Expression in Escherichia coli of N- and C-terminally deleted human holocarboxylase synthetase. Influence of the N-terminus on biotinylation and identification of a minimum functional protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:12310–12316. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
[19]. [19]Dupuis L, Campeau E, Leclerc D, Gravel RA. Mechanism of biotin responsiveness in biotin-responsive multiple carboxylase deficiency. Mol. Genet. Metab. 1999;66:80–90. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
[20]. [20]Varadan R, et al. Structural determinants for selective recognition of a Lys48-linked polyubiquitin chain by a UBA domain. Mol. Cell. 2005;18:687–698. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
[21]. [21]Bohm G, et al. Quantitative analysis of protein far UV circular dichroism spectra by neural networks. Protein Eng. 1992;5:191–195. MEDLINE Division of Magnetic Resonance Research, Korea Basic Science Institute, 804-1 Yangcheong-Ri, Ochang-Eup, Cheongwon-Gun, Chungbuk 363-883, Republic of Korea Bio-Analytical Science Program, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon 350-333, Republic of Korea Corresponding authors. Address: Division of Magnetic Resonance Research, Korea Basic Science Institute, 804-1 Yangcheong-Ri, Ochang-Eup, Cheongwon-Gun, Chungbuk 363-883, Republic of Korea. Fax: +82 43 240 5059.
PII: S0014-5793(10)00047-5 doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2009.12.059 © 2010 Federation of European Biochemical Societies | |
|